Parliamentary Form of Government: Meaning, Features & Pros
Detailed guide to the Parliamentary Form of Government explaining meaning, features, merits, demerits, examples, and comparison for exams.

Introduction
The Parliamentary Form of Government is one of the most widely practiced systems of governance in the world. In this system, the executive is responsible to the legislature, and the real executive power lies with the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers. This form of government is based on the principle of cooperation and coordination between the executive and the legislature.
Countries like India, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Japan follow the parliamentary system in different forms.
Meaning of Parliamentary Form of Government
The Parliamentary Form of Government is a system in which:
-
The legislature and executive are closely connected
-
The executive emerges from the legislature
-
The executive remains in power as long as it enjoys the confidence of the legislature
-
The Head of State is nominal, while the Head of Government is real
In this system, the Prime Minister is the leader of the majority party and exercises real authority.
Origin and Development
The parliamentary system originated in England (United Kingdom). Over centuries, the power of the monarchy gradually reduced, and authority shifted to the elected representatives in Parliament.
The success of the British system influenced many countries, especially former British colonies, including India, which adopted this system after independence in 1950.
Main Features of Parliamentary Form of Government
1. Dual Executive
The parliamentary system has a dual executive:
-
Nominal Executive: Head of State (President/Monarch)
-
Real Executive: Prime Minister and Council of Ministers
The Head of State performs ceremonial functions, while actual power is exercised by the Prime Minister.
2. Fusion of Powers
Unlike the presidential system, there is a fusion of powers between the executive and the legislature.
Ministers are also members of the legislature and actively participate in law-making.
3. Collective Responsibility
The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the lower house of the legislature.
If a no-confidence motion is passed, the entire ministry must resign.
4. Political Homogeneity
The executive and legislature usually belong to the same political party or coalition, ensuring smooth coordination and policy implementation.
5. Leadership of the Prime Minister
The Prime Minister is the real head of the government:
-
Selects and dismisses ministers
-
Controls government policies
-
Acts as a link between the President and the Cabinet
6. No Fixed Tenure
The government does not have a fixed tenure.
It remains in power only as long as it enjoys the confidence of the legislature.
7. Role of Opposition
The opposition plays a vital role by:
-
Criticizing government policies
-
Questioning ministers
-
Protecting democratic values
This ensures accountability and transparency.
Merits (Advantages) of Parliamentary Form of Government
1. Responsible Government
The executive is answerable to the legislature, ensuring democratic accountability.
2. Flexibility
The system is flexible because:
-
An inefficient government can be removed
-
A strong leader can continue with legislative support
3. Better Coordination
Fusion of powers ensures smooth functioning and reduces conflicts between organs of government.
4. Prevents Dictatorship
Since the Prime Minister can be removed at any time, the chances of dictatorship are minimal.
5. Suitable for Diverse Societies
This system works well in countries with diverse populations, as coalition governments allow representation of multiple interests.
Demerits (Disadvantages) of Parliamentary Form of Government
1. Political Instability
Frequent no-confidence motions and coalition breakdowns can cause unstable governments.
2. Weak Executive
The Prime Minister may become weak if dependent on coalition partners.
3. Party Dominance
The ruling party may dominate Parliament, reducing meaningful debate.
4. Slow Decision-Making
Decisions may be delayed due to discussions, debates, and compromises.
5. Dependence on Legislature
The executive may prioritize political survival over national interest.
Parliamentary Form of Government in India
India adopted the parliamentary system because:
-
It ensures responsible government
-
It reflects democratic traditions
-
It suits India’s diverse social structure
In India:
-
The President is the nominal executive
-
The Prime Minister is the real executive
-
The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha
Parliamentary vs Presidential Form of Government
| Parliamentary System | Presidential System |
|---|---|
| Real power with Prime Minister | Real power with President |
| Fusion of powers | Separation of powers |
| No fixed tenure | Fixed tenure |
| Executive responsible to legislature | Executive independent of legislature |
| Flexible but sometimes unstable | Stable but rigid |
Countries Following Parliamentary System
Some countries following this system are:
-
India
-
United Kingdom
-
Canada
-
Australia
-
Japan
Conclusion
The Parliamentary Form of Government emphasizes responsibility, accountability, and cooperation between the executive and the legislature. While it may face issues like instability and slow decision-making, it remains one of the most democratic and flexible systems of governance.
Its success largely depends on:
-
Strong political institutions
-
Responsible opposition
-
Political awareness among citizens
When supported by democratic values, the parliamentary system proves to be effective and people-oriented.
